Ink Finance White Paper (v2.0)
  • Ink Finance White Paper (v2.0)
  • Background
    • The Inadequate DeFi Lending Regime
  • Ink Finance Overview
    • An On-demand SaaS for Credit-based DeFi
    • Key Objectives and Features
      • Scalability of On-chain Execution
      • Convenience of Plug-and-Play
      • Hierarchical Economy
      • Integrity Assurance
      • Comprehensive Fiscal & Financial Tooling
      • Bespoke Financial Products
      • Compliance to Regulation
  • INK Modules And Use Cases
    • INK Modules Overview
    • INK Products Module
      • Unified Custodian Vault
      • InkEnvelope
      • Product Representing Ownership of Equity
      • Lending Product with Option-like Risk Control
      • Asset Management Products
        • Example - A Crypto ETF
        • Example - A Private Fund
    • INK Governance Module
      • Hierarchical DAO Construction
        • Administrative and Financial Control
        • DAO Tokens and Badges
        • The INK Staking Engine
      • Voting Power
      • Execution of Resolutions
        • Executing Off-chain Resolutions
        • Executing On-chain Resolutions
      • “Plug-and-Play” Committee Configuration
        • “Pluggable” Committees and Use Cases
        • Integrity of Managers
      • Intra-Committee Operations
    • INK Multichain Module
  • INK Integration Module
  • Business Model & Tokenomics
    • QUILL Utilities and Value Proposition
      • Governance Capital for DAOs
      • Fee Capture Utility
      • Public Incubation Capital
    • Allocation and Vesting
    • INK Economy Rules
      • QUILL Emission Pool
      • The INK Treasury
  • about
    • Core Team
    • Follow Ink Finance
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Ink Finance Overview
  2. Key Objectives and Features

Integrity Assurance

Answers to the challenge of Sybil and whale attacks in a blockchain operating environment.

PreviousHierarchical EconomyNextComprehensive Fiscal & Financial Tooling

Last updated 2 years ago

Whether an ecosystem consists of one meta DAO or many sub DAOs, Sybil and “whale” resistance is always a challenge on blockchains.

Ink Finance's first line of defense against Sybil attack is through a highly customizable staking mechanism. While assigning an explicit governance utility to a DAO’s meta token, it substantially raises the barrier of DAO members using multiple wallets to recycle the same amount of tokens in voting.

Meanwhile, the platform integrates with the best decentralized biometric identity protocols (such as ) to securely verify members while maintaining their privacy. This mechanism can be used to maintain the connection between users’ decentralized roles on all deployed blockchains and their biometric identities, ensuring the “one-wallet-one-person” governance basis. Other widely accepted DID solutions will also be added to INK’s technological stack for specially missioned DAOs to choose from.

For transparency of critical roles, such as multi-signers, the auditors, or even normal DAO members in KYC-required applications, the platform integrates with the best decentralized legal identity protocols (such as ).

Regarding the governance rights at sub DAOs, it is critical for them to operate under various autonomous models that are resistant to the interference of the meta-level “whales”. The platform devises a badge mechanism (more on this in the later discussion) allowing sub DAOs to develop their own whale-mitigating schemes while still operating under the meta banner.

Humanode
Astra